Erica Cardwell’s debut book Wrong is Not My Name: Notes on (Black) Art is about
art, race, family and perhaps most prominently, about grief. Through her
personal experiences with these themes, Cardwell’s voice as art critic is still
undeniably present throughout the entirety of the text. Wrong is Not My Name
reminds readers of the power of art to push us towards growth, but in the
context of this issue on Aesthetic Education, I focus on Cardwell’s approach to
art as critic, which she continually grounds in her approach to art as learner.
It is this orientation in particular that I think offers those of us who aspire
to, or perhaps already practice, art criticism a reflection on the impact of our
work and the attitudes we bring to it.
This paper addresses positionality misreading in Western pedagogical adaptions
of belly dancing. Raqs Sharqi, known in the West as belly dancing, is a
predominantly West Asian and North African discipline and performance art with
multimodal varieties, globally taught and practiced while crossing sport,
narratology, and story-telling boundaries. As a unique performance activity, it
portrays a dynamic entertainment space to connect one’s multiple identities. I
argue that Raqs Sharqi, not only as an aesthetic-educational art form but also,
perhaps unwittingly, reiterated as an Orientalist communication trope in belly
dancing, has forged East-West performativity models. However, the historical
education-literature for Western women and modern adaptions of Raqs Sharqi are
socio-culturally disconnected. In want of aesthetic meaning-making for
contemporary cultural identity elaborations, Western pedagogical and adaption
processes overlook elemental aspects including cultural perspectives, the
process of cognitive development, individual authenticity, and group politics of
belonging and autonomy.
Challenging Eurocentric and English-speaking narratives about Middle Eastern
identities, Raqs Sharqi, in its intersectional positionality, is the loci of
continued West Asian and North African identity heterogeneities. The narrative
fluidity afforded to this historical and religious conceptualization, I contend,
is somewhat lost in conceptions of Western dance homogeneity in entertainment.
Reasons are multidimensional, illustrative of patriarchal histories of women’s
education, Western literary and art erotic-exotic rhetoric traps, and the
influence of contemporary media and digitalization. Drawing on philosophical
foregrounding, Dialogical Self Theory (DST), and symbolic interactionism, this
study elucidates the progress of escapism and performativity enforced by
positionality misreadings in Raqs Sharqi. In so doing, I expand on the colonial
continuity of dance pedagogy, delineating the socio-positionalities of pedagogic
framing and empowerment double standards.
This paper examines Mary Wollstonecraft’s strategic use of sentimental animal
tropes alongside rationalist critique in Maria, or The Wrongs of Woman (1798)
and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), arguing that she mobilizes
sensibility not as an end in itself, but as a pedagogical instrument within a
broader project of aesthetic education—one intended to move readers from
affective sympathy toward political and philosophical judgment. Focusing in
particular on animal metaphors—especially in the character of Jemima, who
repeatedly figures herself as a domesticated and brutalized creature—I trace how
Wollstonecraft employs tropes of animality to illuminate the processes by which
women are rendered less than human. At the same time, she insists that the very
faculty denied to women by patriarchal society—rational reflection—is what marks
the boundary between the human and the nonhuman. In this light, animal metaphors
function paradoxically: they expose women’s dehumanization while simultaneously
staging the reassertion of their moral and intellectual agency. Wollstonecraft’s
appeal to sympathy, therefore, is intentionally unstable. It elicits emotional
identification with suffering women only to disrupt that identification, urging
readers to critique the social and epistemological structures that produce such
suffering in the first place.
This paper addresses positionality misreading in Western pedagogical adaptions
of belly dancing. Raqs Sharqi, known in the West as belly dancing, is a
predominantly West Asian and North African discipline and performance art with
multimodal varieties, globally taught and practiced while crossing sport,
narratology, and story-telling boundaries. As a unique performance activity, it
portrays a dynamic entertainment space to connect one’s multiple identities. I
argue that Raqs Sharqi, not only as an aesthetic-educational art form but also,
perhaps unwittingly, reiterated as an Orientalist communication trope in belly
dancing, has forged East-West performativity models. However, the historical
education-literature for Western women and modern adaptions of Raqs Sharqi are
socio-culturally disconnected. In want of aesthetic meaning-making for
contemporary cultural identity elaborations, Western pedagogical and adaption
processes overlook elemental aspects including cultural perspectives, the
process of cognitive development, individual authenticity, and group politics of
belonging and autonomy.
Challenging Eurocentric and English-speaking narratives about Middle Eastern
identities, Raqs Sharqi, in its intersectional positionality, is the loci of
continued West Asian and North African identity heterogeneities. The narrative
fluidity afforded to this historical and religious conceptualization, I contend,
is somewhat lost in conceptions of Western dance homogeneity in entertainment.
Reasons are multidimensional, illustrative of patriarchal histories of women’s
education, Western literary and art erotic-exotic rhetoric traps, and the
influence of contemporary media and digitalization. Drawing on philosophical
foregrounding, Dialogical Self Theory (DST), and symbolic interactionism, this
study elucidates the progress of escapism and performativity enforced by
positionality misreadings in Raqs Sharqi. In so doing, I expand on the colonial
continuity of dance pedagogy, delineating the socio-positionalities of pedagogic
framing and empowerment double standards.
This paper explores how digital pedagogies are reshaping the landscape of
Islamic education among Nigerian Muslim women, with a primary focus on Yoruba
communities in Southern Nigeria. Historically, Islamic learning in Nigeria has
been rooted in traditional institutions, notably the madrasa, characterized by
face-to-face instruction and rigid gender norms. However, the proliferation of
digital technologies - particularly online madrasas, WhatsApp study groups,
Zoom-based Qur’anic classes, and Islamic mobile applications - has significantly
altered women’s access to religious knowledge. Utilizing ethnographic evidence
and qualitative interviews, this interdisciplinary study examines how digital
platforms enhance accessibility, overcome sociocultural barriers, and enable
Nigerian Yoruba Muslim women to engage with a global Islamic discourse. The
analysis underscores the benefits of digital transformation, including increased
autonomy in learning, flexibility, and expanded religious authority, while
critically addressing challenges such as digital literacy gaps, infrastructural
disparities, and concerns about content authenticity. By applying perspectives
from digital pedagogy, Islamic educational traditions, and gender studies, this
research highlights how technological innovations facilitate a dynamic,
responsive form of Islamic scholarship that meets contemporary educational
needs. Finally, the study outlines avenues for future research, emphasizing the
need for deeper investigations into equitable access and sustained integration
of digital and traditional Islamic learning frameworks.
This paper examines Mary Wollstonecraft’s strategic use of sentimental animal
tropes alongside rationalist critique in Maria, or The Wrongs of Woman (1798)
and A Vindication of the Rights of Woman (1792), arguing that she mobilizes
sensibility not as an end in itself, but as a pedagogical instrument within a
broader project of aesthetic education—one intended to move readers from
affective sympathy toward political and philosophical judgment. Focusing in
particular on animal metaphors—especially in the character of Jemima, who
repeatedly figures herself as a domesticated and brutalized creature—I trace how
Wollstonecraft employs tropes of animality to illuminate the processes by which
women are rendered less than human. At the same time, she insists that the very
faculty denied to women by patriarchal society—rational reflection—is what marks
the boundary between the human and the nonhuman. In this light, animal metaphors
function paradoxically: they expose women’s dehumanization while simultaneously
staging the reassertion of their moral and intellectual agency. Wollstonecraft’s
appeal to sympathy, therefore, is intentionally unstable. It elicits emotional
identification with suffering women only to disrupt that identification, urging
readers to critique the social and epistemological structures that produce such
suffering in the first place.
This paper addresses positionality misreading in Western pedagogical adaptions
of belly dancing. Raqs Sharqi, known in the West as belly dancing, is a
predominantly West Asian and North African discipline and performance art with
multimodal varieties, globally taught and practiced while crossing sport,
narratology, and story-telling boundaries. As a unique performance activity, it
portrays a dynamic entertainment space to connect one’s multiple identities. I
argue that Raqs Sharqi, not only as an aesthetic-educational art form but also,
perhaps unwittingly, reiterated as an Orientalist communication trope in belly
dancing, has forged East-West performativity models. However, the historical
education-literature for Western women and modern adaptions of Raqs Sharqi are
socio-culturally disconnected. In want of aesthetic meaning-making for
contemporary cultural identity elaborations, Western pedagogical and adaption
processes overlook elemental aspects including cultural perspectives, the
process of cognitive development, individual authenticity, and group politics of
belonging and autonomy.
Challenging Eurocentric and English-speaking narratives about Middle Eastern
identities, Raqs Sharqi, in its intersectional positionality, is the loci of
continued West Asian and North African identity heterogeneities. The narrative
fluidity afforded to this historical and religious conceptualization, I contend,
is somewhat lost in conceptions of Western dance homogeneity in entertainment.
Reasons are multidimensional, illustrative of patriarchal histories of women’s
education, Western literary and art erotic-exotic rhetoric traps, and the
influence of contemporary media and digitalization. Drawing on philosophical
foregrounding, Dialogical Self Theory (DST), and symbolic interactionism, this
study elucidates the progress of escapism and performativity enforced by
positionality misreadings in Raqs Sharqi. In so doing, I expand on the colonial
continuity of dance pedagogy, delineating the socio-positionalities of pedagogic
framing and empowerment double standards.
Erica Cardwell’s debut book Wrong is Not My Name: Notes on (Black) Art is about
art, race, family and perhaps most prominently, about grief. Through her
personal experiences with these themes, Cardwell’s voice as art critic is still
undeniably present throughout the entirety of the text. Wrong is Not My Name
reminds readers of the power of art to push us towards growth, but in the
context of this issue on Aesthetic Education, I focus on Cardwell’s approach to
art as critic, which she continually grounds in her approach to art as learner.
It is this orientation in particular that I think offers those of us who aspire
to, or perhaps already practice, art criticism a reflection on the impact of our
work and the attitudes we bring to it.
This paper explores how digital pedagogies are reshaping the landscape of
Islamic education among Nigerian Muslim women, with a primary focus on Yoruba
communities in Southern Nigeria. Historically, Islamic learning in Nigeria has
been rooted in traditional institutions, notably the madrasa, characterized by
face-to-face instruction and rigid gender norms. However, the proliferation of
digital technologies - particularly online madrasas, WhatsApp study groups,
Zoom-based Qur’anic classes, and Islamic mobile applications - has significantly
altered women’s access to religious knowledge. Utilizing ethnographic evidence
and qualitative interviews, this interdisciplinary study examines how digital
platforms enhance accessibility, overcome sociocultural barriers, and enable
Nigerian Yoruba Muslim women to engage with a global Islamic discourse. The
analysis underscores the benefits of digital transformation, including increased
autonomy in learning, flexibility, and expanded religious authority, while
critically addressing challenges such as digital literacy gaps, infrastructural
disparities, and concerns about content authenticity. By applying perspectives
from digital pedagogy, Islamic educational traditions, and gender studies, this
research highlights how technological innovations facilitate a dynamic,
responsive form of Islamic scholarship that meets contemporary educational
needs. Finally, the study outlines avenues for future research, emphasizing the
need for deeper investigations into equitable access and sustained integration
of digital and traditional Islamic learning frameworks.