Gender comparison of physiologic and perceptual responses in recreational marathon runners
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2009
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of this investigation was to compare gender differences in physiologic and perceptual responses during a 1-h run at recent marathon pace and running economy at three speeds in recreational marathon runners. Methods: In a counterbalanced design, 10 men and 10 women completed a 1-h treadmill run and a running economy test. Treadmill, speed for the 1-h run ranged, from 141 to 241 m·min-1 and 134, 168, and 188 m·min-1 for running economy. Physiologic parameters (oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide production, pulmonary ventilation, and heart rate) and perceived exertion were measured. Repeated-measures ANOVA was used to compare any gender differences (P < .05) during the 1-h run and a two-way ANOVA was used to compare running economy. With this sample, estimated marathon energy expenditure, body composition, and maximal physiologic function was reported.1 Results: With the exception of an allometric expression of VO2 (mL·min-1-kg BW-0.75), similar gender physiologic and perceptual responses were found during the 1-h run. Although not significant, the females exercised at a higher percent VO2max (8% to 9%) during the run. Similar gender differences were also noted during the running economy tests. Conclusions: Although the male runners completed a recent marathon significantly faster than the females, similar gender physiologic and perceptual responses were generally found during the 1-h treadmill run and the running economy tests. © 2009 Human Kinetics, Inc.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
First Page
307
Last Page
316
Recommended Citation
Loftin, M., Sothern, M., Tuuri, G., Tompkins, C., Koss, C., & Bonis, M. (2009). Gender comparison of physiologic and perceptual responses in recreational marathon runners. International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance, 4 (3), 307-316. https://doi.org/10.1123/ijspp.4.3.307