An evaluation of lag schedules and prompting methods to increase variability of naming category items in children with autism spectrum disorder

Katie M. Wiskow, Department of Psychology and Child Development, College of Science, California State University, Stanislaus, One University Circle, Turlock, CA 95382 USA.
Ashley L. Matter, Trumpet Behavioral Health, Dublin, CA USA.
Jeanne M. Donaldson, Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA USA.

Abstract

A lag schedule of reinforcement is one way to increase response variability; however, previous research has been mixed with regard to the necessary parameters to increase variability. For some individuals, low schedule requirements (e.g., Lag 1) are sufficient to increase variability. For other individuals, higher lag schedules (e.g., Lag 3) or a lag schedule in combination with prompting is needed to increase variability. We evaluated the efficiency of different within-session progressive lag schedules to increase response variability with 2 children with autism. Results showed that increasing the lag criterion across sessions increased variability to levels similar to beginning with a high lag schedule for one participant. When lag schedules did not increase variability for the second participant, we compared a variety of prompting procedures. Results of the prompting evaluation showed that a tact-priming procedure was effective to increase varied responding.