Nodal leaf area distribution in soybean plants grown in high yield environments
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
7-1-2011
Abstract
At any given time, the leaf area index (LAI) of a soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] crop consists of the summed contributions of each tri foliolate leaf present at each main stem node and on branches. No data are available on nodal LAI distributions in modern indeterminate (IN) or semi-determinate (SD) cultivars grown in irrigated, early-planted, high-yield production systems. The impact of stem termination type and row spacing on that distribution was investigated in such environments at Lincoln, NE in 2003, 2004, and 2005. Tri folio late LAI at each stem node followed a temporal pattern of rapid increase (after leaf initiation) to a peak before declining due to senescence-driven leaf abscission, thus emulating, on a shorter time-scale, the canopy LAI pattern. The post-peak decline in nodal LAI was rapid in nodes initiated pre bloom (i.e., nearly 100% abscission before seed-fill), but was gradual in nodes initiated after pod initiation (i.e., little abscission before plant maturity). Nodal LAI peaked at the eighth node of the IN cultivar, but rapid leaf expansion at pre flowering nodes of the SD cultivar led to a broad peak spanning the fifth to eighth node. Simulation of the Beer-Lambert law of light attenuation in both canopies revealed that light penetration was deeper in the IN canopy than in the SD canopy. Although higher plant density suppressed branching (and thus branch leaf area) in the SD cultivar, this was not observed in the IN cultivar. These findings suggested that nodal LAI development can be used to mechanistically model canopy LAI. © 2011 by the American Society of Agronomy. All rights reserved.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Agronomy Journal
First Page
1198
Last Page
1205
Recommended Citation
Setiyono, T., Bastidas, A., Cassman, K., Weiss, A., Dobermann, A., & Specht, J. (2011). Nodal leaf area distribution in soybean plants grown in high yield environments. Agronomy Journal, 103 (4), 1198-1205. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2011.0051