Predicting runoff of suspended solids and particulate phosphorus for selected Louisiana soils using simple soil tests
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2007
Abstract
This study was conducted to evaluate the relationships among total suspended solids (TSS) and particulate phosphorus (PP) in runoff and selected soil properties. Nine Louisiana soils were subjected to simulated rainfall events, and runoff collected and analyzed for various parameters. A highly significant relationship existed between runoff TSS and runoff turbidity. Both runoff TSS and turbidity were also significandy related to runoff PP, which on average accounted for more than 98% of total P (TP) in the runoff. Runoff TSS was closely and positively related to soil clay content in an exponential fashion (y = 0.10e0.01x, R2 = 0.91, P < 0.001) while it was inversely related to soil electrical conductivity (EC) (y = 0.02 x -3.95, R2 = 0.70, P < 0.01). A newly-devised laboratory test, termed "soil suspension turbidity" (SST) which measures turbidity in a 1:200 soil/water suspension, exhibited highly significant linear relationships with runoff TSS (y = 0.06x - 4.38, R2 = 0.82, P < 0.001) and PP (y = 0.04x + 2.68, R2 = 0.85, P < 0.001). In addition, SST alone yielded similar R2 value to that of combining soil clay content and EC in a multiple regression, suggesting that SST was able to account for the integrated effect of clay content and electrolytic background on runoff TSS. The SST test could be used for assessment and management of sediment and particulate nutrient losses in surface runoff. Copyright © 2007 by the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America. All rights reserved.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Journal of Environmental Quality
First Page
1310
Last Page
1317
Recommended Citation
Udeigwe, T., Wang, J., & Zhang, H. (2007). Predicting runoff of suspended solids and particulate phosphorus for selected Louisiana soils using simple soil tests. Journal of Environmental Quality, 36 (5), 1310-1317. https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2006.0314