Authors

Maggie L. Li, Cornell University
Anna Y.Q. Ho, Cornell University
Geoffrey Ryan, Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics
Daniel A. Perley, Liverpool John Moores University
Gavin P. Lamb, Liverpool John Moores University
A. J. Nayana, National Centre for Radio Astrophysics India
Igor Andreoni, University of Maryland, College Park
G. C. Anupama, Indian Institute of Astrophysics
Eric C. Bellm, University of Washington
Edo Berger, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Joshua S. Bloom, University of California, Berkeley
Eric Burns, Louisiana State University
Ilaria Caiazzo, California Institute of Technology
Poonam Chandra, National Radio Astronomy Observatory
Michael W. Coughlin, College of Science and Engineering
Kareem El-Badry, California Institute of Technology
Matthew J. Graham, California Institute of Technology
Mansi Kasliwal, California Institute of Technology
Garrett K. Keating, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
S. R. Kulkarni, California Institute of Technology
Harsh Kumar, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Frank J. Masci, Infrared Processing & Analysis Center
Richard A. Perley, National Radio Astronomy Observatory Socorro
Josiah Purdum, California Institute of Technology
Ramprasad Rao, Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
Antonio C. Rodriguez, California Institute of Technology
Ben Rusholme, Infrared Processing & Analysis Center
Nikhil Sarin, Stockholms universitet
Jesper Sollerman, Oskar Klein Centre
Gokul P. Srinivasaragavan, University of Maryland, College Park
Vishwajeet Swain, Indian Institute of Technology Bombay
Zachary Vanderbosch, California Institute of Technology

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

5-20-2025

Abstract

In the past few years, the improved sensitivity and cadence of wide-field optical surveys have enabled the discovery of several afterglows without associated detected gamma-ray bursts (GRBs). We present the identification, observations, and multiwavelength modeling of a recent such afterglow (AT 2023lcr), and model three literature events (AT 2020blt, AT 2021any, and AT 2021lfa) in a consistent fashion. For each event, we consider the following possibilities as to why a GRB was not observed: (1) the jet was off-axis; (2) the jet had a low initial Lorentz factor; and (3) the afterglow was the result of an on-axis classical GRB (on-axis jet with physical parameters typical of the GRB population), but the emission was undetected by gamma-ray satellites. We estimate all physical parameters using afterglowpy and Markov Chain Monte Carlo methods from emcee. We find that AT 2023lcr, AT 2020blt, and AT 2021any are consistent with on-axis classical GRBs, and AT 2021lfa is consistent with both on-axis low Lorentz factor (Γ0 ≈ 5-13) and off-axis (θobs = 2θjet) high Lorentz factor (Γ0 ≈ 100) jets.

Publication Source (Journal or Book title)

Astrophysical Journal

Share

COinS