Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2023
Abstract
Among the rhetorical pleas that follow most instances of public dissatisfaction is the call for more or better accountability. Accountability is a lauded notion, a “golden concept” that is considered widely as critical to the success of democratic government. Such pleas, I will argue, are misplaced. Rather than starting from the premise of accountability as an idea that no one can be against, I consider the possibility that accountability undermines the very notion it ostensibly promotes: self-government. The concept of accountability in modern political theory is tied more closely to the emergence of an impersonal administrative state than it is to the hopeful horizon of a democratic one. In practice and in theory, it is a concept of irresponsibility, a technological approach to government that provides the comforts of impersonal rationality.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Substantive Accountability in Europe S New Economic Governance
First Page
45
Last Page
62
Recommended Citation
Heidelberg, R. (2023). Reconsidering the Good of Improving Accountability. Substantive Accountability in Europe S New Economic Governance, 45-62. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009228800.004