Identifier
etd-07032012-160303
Degree
Master of Arts (MA)
Department
Philosophy and Religious Studies
Document Type
Thesis
Abstract
In this paper, I examine two standard theories of intellectual property, voice criticisms of each theory from within their own perspectives, and offer an alternative approach to intellectual property. In the first chapter, I explicate Locke’s original property theory and provide a modern account of Lockean intellectual property as an extension of the original theory. I argue this extension is not compatible with Locke’s original thought on property rights. In the second chapter, I dissect the mainstream economic approach to intellectual property, an approach which employs utilitarianism to justify the intellectual property regime of first world, western nations. I argue that this mainstream utilitarian economic approach fails to satisfy the principle of utility. Lastly, I offer a sketch of an alternative theory or perspective on intellectual property based on the notion of human flourishing. I argue that our obligations to develop and use our minds are so extensive that exclusive claim-type intellectual property rights are not possible.
Date
2012
Document Availability at the Time of Submission
Release the entire work immediately for access worldwide.
Recommended Citation
Morrissey, Michael, "An alternative to intellectual property theories of Locke and utilitarian economics" (2012). LSU Master's Theses. 3332.
https://repository.lsu.edu/gradschool_theses/3332
Committee Chair
Rocha, James
DOI
10.31390/gradschool_theses.3332