Authors

Michael J. Bentley, Durham University
Colm Ocofaigh, Durham University
John B. Anderson, Rice University
Howard Conway, University of Washington
Bethan Davies, Aberystwyth University
Alastair G.C. Graham, University of Exeter
Claus Dieter Hillenbrand, British Antarctic Survey
Dominic A. Hodgson, British Antarctic Survey
Stewart S.R. Jamieson, Durham University
Robert D. Larter, British Antarctic Survey
Andrew Mackintosh, Victoria University of Wellington
James A. Smith, British Antarctic Survey
Elie Verleyen, Universiteit Gent
Robert P. Ackert, Harvard University
Philip J. Bart, Louisiana State University
Sonja Berg, Universität zu Köln
Daniel Brunstein, Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne
Miquel Canals, Universitat de Barcelona
Eric A. Colhoun, School of Environmental and Life Sciences
Xavier Crosta, Environnements et Paléoenvironnements Océaniques et Continentaux
William A. Dickens, British Antarctic Survey
Eugene Domack, University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Julian A. Dowdeswell, Scott Polar Research Institute
Robert Dunbar, Stanford University
Werner Ehrmann, Universität Leipzig
Jeffrey Evans, Loughborough University
Vincent Favier, Institut des Géosciences de l'Environnement (IGE)
David Fink, Australian Nuclear Science and Technology Organisation
Christopher J. Fogwill, UNSW Sydney
Neil F. Glasser, Aberystwyth University
Karsten Gohl, Alfred-Wegener-Institut Helmholtz-Zentrum für Polar- und Meeresforschung
Nicholas R. Golledge, Victoria University of Wellington
Ian Goodwin, Macquarie University

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-15-2014

Abstract

A robust understanding of Antarctic Ice Sheet deglacial history since the Last Glacial Maximum is important in order to constrain ice sheet and glacial-isostatic adjustment models, and to explore the forcing mechanisms responsible for ice sheet retreat. Such understanding can be derived from a broad range of geological and glaciological datasets and recent decades have seen an upsurge in such data gathering around the continent and Sub-Antarctic islands. Here, we report a new synthesis of those datasets, based on an accompanying series of reviews of the geological data, organised by sector. We present a series of timeslice maps for 20ka, 15ka, 10ka and 5ka, including grounding line position and ice sheet thickness changes, along with a clear assessment of levels of confidence. The reconstruction shows that the Antarctic Ice sheet did not everywhere reach the continental shelf edge at its maximum, that initial retreat was asynchronous, and that the spatial pattern of deglaciation was highly variable, particularly on the inner shelf. The deglacial reconstruction is consistent with a moderate overall excess ice volume and with a relatively small Antarctic contribution to meltwater pulse 1a. We discuss key areas of uncertainty both around the continent and by time interval, and we highlight potential priorit. © 2014 The Authors.

Publication Source (Journal or Book title)

Quaternary Science Reviews

First Page

1

Last Page

9

Share

COinS