Reply to "a comment on 'a hedging deficiency in eurodollar futures'"
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
2-1-2007
Abstract
Kawaller's argument that a perfect hedge is possible with eurodollar futures is limited to the notion of a perfect accounting hedge, whereby the time value of money is ignored. In addition, his attempt to show the importance of sizing the hedge merely introduces a change to the problem, leading to a difference in our results that he erroneously believes is a mistake on my part. It is easy to show that his example is driven by an irrelevant distraction. I correct his example and show that had he worked the same problem I worked, he would have worked it the same way I did. © 2007 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Journal of Futures Markets
First Page
195
Last Page
201
Recommended Citation
Chance, D. (2007). Reply to "a comment on 'a hedging deficiency in eurodollar futures'". Journal of Futures Markets, 27 (2), 195-201. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.20254