Authors

Minhan Dai, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Ya Wei Luo, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Eric P. Achterberg, GEOMAR - Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
Thomas J. Browning, GEOMAR - Helmholtz-Zentrum für Ozeanforschung Kiel
Yihua Cai, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Zhimian Cao, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Fei Chai, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Bingzhang Chen, University of Strathclyde
Matthew J. Church, University of Montana Missoula
Dongjian Ci, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Chuanjun Du, Hainan University
Kunshan Gao, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Xianghui Guo, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Zhendong Hu, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Shuh Ji Kao, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Edward A. Laws, Louisiana State University
Zhongping Lee, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Hongyang Lin, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Qian Liu, Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education
Xin Liu, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Weicheng Luo, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Feifei Meng, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Shaoling Shang, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Dalin Shi, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Hiroaki Saito, The University of Tokyo
Luping Song, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Xianhui Sean Wan, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Yuntao Wang, Ministry of Natural Resources of the People's Republic of China
Wei Lei Wang, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Zuozhu Wen, State Key Laboratory of Marine Environmental Science
Peng Xiu, South China Sea Institute of Oceanology
Jing Zhang, Key Laboratory of Marine Chemistry Theory and Technology, Ministry of Education
Ruifeng Zhang, Shanghai Jiao Tong University

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

9-1-2023

Abstract

Subtropical gyres cover 26%–29% of the world's surface ocean and are conventionally regarded as ocean deserts due to their permanent stratification, depleted surface nutrients, and low biological productivity. Despite tremendous advances over the past three decades, particularly through the Hawaii Ocean Time-series and the Bermuda Atlantic Time-series Study, which have revolutionized our understanding of the biogeochemistry in oligotrophic marine ecosystems, the gyres remain understudied. We review current understanding of upper ocean biogeochemistry in the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre, considering other subtropical gyres for comparison. We focus our synthesis on spatial variability, which shows larger than expected dynamic ranges of properties such as nutrient concentrations, rates of N2 fixation, and biological production. This review provides new insights into how nutrient sources drive community structure and export in upper subtropical gyres. We examine the euphotic zone (EZ) in subtropical gyres as a two-layered vertically structured system: a nutrient-depleted layer above the top of the nutricline in the well-lit upper ocean and a nutrient-replete layer below in the dimly lit waters. These layers vary in nutrient supply and stoichiometries and physical forcing, promoting differences in community structure and food webs, with direct impacts on the magnitude and composition of export production. We evaluate long-term variations in key biogeochemical parameters in both of these EZ layers. Finally, we identify major knowledge gaps and research challenges in these vast and unique systems that offer opportunities for future studies.

Publication Source (Journal or Book title)

Reviews of Geophysics

Share

COinS