A comparison of compatible and annual growth models
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-1-2003
Abstract
Compatible growth and yield models are desirable because they provide the same growth estimates regardless of length of growth periods. However, the compatibility constraints restrict the number of possible models. This restriction might be overcome by using models that predict annual stand growth based on periodic measurements. The advantages of this approach are (1) the flexibility allowed in building annual growth models without constraints, and (2) the step-invariance property maintained by these models. An annual growth model was developed in this study that predicts yield based on information from the previous year. For 162 plots from the Southwide Seed Source Study of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.), the annual growth model provided better predictions of stand survival, basal area, and volume than two compatible growth models.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Forest Science
First Page
285
Last Page
290
Recommended Citation
Ochi, N., & Cao, Q. (2003). A comparison of compatible and annual growth models. Forest Science, 49 (2), 285-290. Retrieved from https://repository.lsu.edu/agrnr_pubs/67