Integrated cognitive behavioral therapy for comorbid cannabis use and anxiety disorders: A pilot randomized controlled trial

Julia D. Buckner, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States. Electronic address: jbuckner@lsu.edu.
Michael J. Zvolensky, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States; University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
Anthony H. Ecker, South Central Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center, Houston, TX, United States; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, United States.
Norman B. Schmidt, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, United States.
Elizabeth M. Lewis, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, United States.
Daniel J. Paulus, University of Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Paula Lopez-Gamundi, University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, United States.
Kathleen A. Crapanzano

Abstract

Cannabis use disorder (CUD) is the most common illicit substance use disorder and individuals with CUD have high rates of comorbid anxiety disorders. Comorbidity between CUD and anxiety disorders is of public health relevance given that although motivation enhancement therapy (MET) combined with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) is an efficacious intervention for CUD, outcomes are worse for patients with elevated anxiety. The current study tested the acceptability and efficacy of the integration of a transdiagnostic anxiety CBT (i.e., treatment of patients with any anxiety disorder) with MET-CBT (integrated cannabis and anxiety reduction treatment, or ICART) for CUD compared to MET-CBT alone. Treatment-seeking cannabis users (56.4% male, M = 23.2, 63.3% non-Hispanic White) with CUD and at least one comorbid anxiety disorder were randomly assigned to ICART (n = 27) or MET-CBT (n = 28). Patients in the ICART condition attended significantly more treatment sessions than those in the MET-CBT condition. Patients in the ICART condition were more likely to be abstinent post-treatment than those in MET-CBT. Further, treatment produced decreases in cannabis use and related problems. Notably, therapy type did not moderate the impact of treatment on frequency of use and related problems. Together, these data suggest that ICART may be at least as efficacious as a gold-standard psychosocial CUD treatment, MET-CBT, for a difficult-to-treat subpopulation of cannabis users.