Mentorship in clinical neuropsychology: Survey of current practices, cultural responsiveness, and untapped potential

Matthew Calamia, Department of Psychology, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.
Erin T. Kaseda, Department of Psychology, Rosalind Franklin University of Medicine and Science, North Chicago, IL, USA.
Jenessa S. Price, Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Alyssa De Vito, Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.
Cheryl H. Silver, Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
Jared Cherry, Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Hannah VanLandingham, Department of Psychology, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA.
Humza Khan

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Neuropsychology trainees have identified mentorship as an important factor in their training. Limited past work has been conducted on mentorship within neuropsychology, and there is a need to better understand the experiences and perspectives of neuropsychology mentors. METHOD: Self-identified mentors in clinical neuropsychology completed a survey about their mentorship practices, including culturally responsive mentorship, as well as perceived barriers and challenges to providing effective mentorship. Themes were derived using qualitative analyses for free response questions, and descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative variables. RESULTS: Mentors identified assessment, professionalism, and ethics as top priorities in mentorship, which may reflect the overlap within neuropsychology of assessment supervision and mentoring. Reported best practices included being self-aware and engaging in a personalized approach to mentorship relationships that varies depending upon the needs of the mentee. A majority reported that their training program is not diverse and they themselves do not mentor trainees from diverse backgrounds which provides a clear area for targeted efforts to recruit and retain diversity in the discipline. Mentors described practices related to discussing diversity-related differences with their trainees including self-disclosure, creating a safe space for conversations, and tailoring discussions to the individual trainee. They reported an interest in more training on how to engage in culturally competent mentorship. Two barriers to providing effective mentorship identified most by mentors were time constraints and a lack of training. CONCLUSIONS: These results highlight a variety of perspectives and approaches to mentorship, which may be beneficial for mentors to consider as they reflect on their mentorship practices and/or for trainees as part of their professional development toward becoming future mentors themselves. These results also highlight the need for a greater emphasis on mentorship training within neuropsychology, including training in culturally responsive mentorship practices.