Date of Award


Document Type


Degree Name

Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)


Plant, Environmental Management and Soil Sciences

First Advisor

Fred A. Martin


The variance-covariance structure of a Louisiana sugarcane (Sacchum spp.) population was estimated and used to calculate correlation coefficients (phenotypic, broad-sense genotypic and additive genetic), narrow-sense heritability and measures of additive genetic variation and gain under selection. Four progeny from each of 20 crosses were grown in plantcane, first ratoon and second ratoon crops at the St. Gabriel Research Station of the Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station. Broad-sense genotypic and phenotypic correlations were calculated and subjected to path-coefficient analysis to study direct and indirect effects in a set of cause and effect relationships involving sucrose yield. Broad-sense genotypic relationships are useful to sugarcane breeders during the field selection of sugarcane cultivars because sugarcane is asexually propagated which fixes all genetic components of variation. Selection priority between asexual stages of reproduction should emphasize cane yield over sucrose concentration. When cane yield cannot be measured directly, stalk number should be given greater emphasis over stalk weight and its components. High Brix and low pith indirectly increased sucrose concentration in the population. Parents contribute one-half of their additive genetic effects to their progeny during sexual reproduction. Narrow-sense genetic variation is useful to the sugarcane breeder during the crossing of parents to produce improved progeny. Additive genetic path-coefficient analysis revealed cane yield, followed by sucrose concentration, was the main contributor to sucrose yield. Crosses involving parents with high Brix and low pith will most likely yield progeny with high sucrose concentration. Stalk number was the sole positive contributor to cane yield at the additive genetic level. Additive genetic coefficients of variation indicate potential future gains in sucrose yield would be greatest by emphasizing cane yield and its primary component stalk number over sucrose concentration. These data also indicate sufficient variability in sucrose concentration to increase sucrose yield as well.