Document Type
Article
Publication Date
4-8-2016
Abstract
The logic of social proof and related arguments posits that decision makers interpret an actor's sociometric position (such as popularity) as a signal for quality, especially when quality itself is difficult to ascertain. Although prior work shows that market-level behavioral patterns are consistent with this micro-level account, we seek to explicitly examine the extent to which (and the conditions under which) sociometric status information actually triggers assumptions about an actor's underlying quality. We introduce two new web-based experiments to investigate how popularity impacts the selection of teammates. We find that the presence of popularity information creates a surprisingly robust quality halo around candidates in some situations but has no effect at all in others. Namely, consistent with Strang and Macy's (2001) theory of adaptive emulation, choice status appears to affect quality perceptions as part of the rationalization for making attachments, but the halo disappears post-adoption. The implications of these results are discussed in the conclusion.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Sociological Science
First Page
239
Last Page
263
Recommended Citation
Lynn, F., Simpson, B., Walker, M., & Peterson, C. (2016). Why is the pack persuasive? The effect of choice status on perceptions of quality. Sociological Science, 3, 239-263. https://doi.org/10.15195/v3.a12