The return of Proto-Mark: A response to David Neville

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2009

Abstract

In my book Rethinking the Gospel Sources: From Proto-Mark to Mark, I presented evidence for a new theory of Synoptic relations, in which all three Synoptics depended on earlier sources, including some form of a "Proto-Mark". My arguments for this theory have been criticized in two articles by David Neville. Neville's criticisms fall into three categories: general criticisms, criticisms of my evidence against direct dependence of one Synoptic on another (Chapters 2 and 3 of my book), and criticisms of the constructive portion of my book. An examination of his critique suggests that it does not damage my case as much as Neville supposed. Ultimately, Neville's disagreements with my work are less significant than his agreements. We both recognize that theories of Markan or Matthean priority have had their day and that future progress in solving the Synoptic Problem will require a hypothesis of some form of Proto-Mark. © 2009 by Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses. All rights reserved.

Publication Source (Journal or Book title)

Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses

First Page

117

Last Page

134

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS