A collaborative approach to adopting/adapting guidelines. The Australian 24-hour movement guidelines for children (5-12 years) and young people (13-17 years): An integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour, and sleep

Authors

Anthony D. Okely, University of Wollongong
Davina Ghersi, Australian Government
Sarah P. Loughran, University of Wollongong
Dylan P. Cliff, University of Wollongong
Trevor Shilton, National Heart Foundation of Australia
Rachel A. Jones, University of Wollongong
Rebecca M. Stanley, University of Wollongong
Julie Sherring, University of Wollongong
Natalie Toms, Preventive Programs
Simon Eckermann, University of Wollongong
Timothy S. Olds, University of South Australia
Zhiguang Zhang, University of Wollongong
Anne Maree Parrish, University of Wollongong
Lisa Kervin, University of Wollongong
Sandra Downie, Preventive Programs
Jo Salmon, The Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition
Clair Bannerman
Tamie Needham
Elaine Marshall
Jordy Kaufman, Swinburne University of Technology
Layne Brown, University of Wollongong
Janecke Wille, Federation of Ethnic Communities Councils of Australia
Greg Wood, Australian Sports Commission
David R. Lubans, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing
Stuart J.H. Biddle, University of Southern Queensland
Shane Pill, Flinders University
Anthea Hargreaves, Cycling and Walking Australia New Zealand
Natalie Jonas, SA
Natasha Schranz, University of South Australia
Perry Campbell, Australian Children's Education and Care Quality Authority (ACECQA)
Karen Ingram, NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA)
Hayley Dean, NSW Education Standards Authority (NESA)
Adam Verrender, University of Wollongong
Yvonne Ellis, University of Wollongong

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2022

Abstract

Abstract: Background: In 2018, the Australian Government updated the Australian Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviour Guidelines for Children and Young People. A requirement of this update was the incorporation of a 24-hour approach to movement, recognising the importance of adequate sleep. The purpose of this paper was to describe how the updated Australian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Young People (5 to 17 years): an integration of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep were developed and the outcomes from this process. Methods: The GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach was used to develop the guidelines. A Leadership Group was formed, who identified existing credible guidelines. The Canadian 24-Hour Movement Guidelines for Children and Youth best met the criteria established by the Leadership Group. These guidelines were evaluated based on the evidence in the GRADE tables, summaries of findings tables and recommendations from the Canadian Guidelines. We conducted updates to each of the Canadian systematic reviews. A Guideline Development Group reviewed, separately and in combination, the evidence for each behaviour. A choice was then made to adopt or adapt the Canadian recommendations for each behaviour or create de novo recommendations. We then conducted an online survey (n=237) along with three focus groups (n=11 in total) and 13 key informant interviews. Stakeholders used these to provide feedback on the draft guidelines. Results: Based on the evidence from the Canadian systematic reviews and the updated systematic reviews in Australia, the Guideline Development Group agreed to adopt the Canadian recommendations and, apart from some minor changes to the wording of good practice statements, maintain the wording of the guidelines, preamble, and title of the Canadian Guidelines. The Australian Guidelines provide evidence-informed recommendations for a healthy day (24-hours), integrating physical activity, sedentary behaviour (including limits to screen time), and sleep for children (5-12 years) and young people (13-17 years). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is only the second time the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach has been used to develop movement behaviour guidelines. The judgments of the Australian Guideline Development Group did not differ sufficiently to change the directions and strength of the recommendations and as such, the Canadian Guidelines were adopted with only very minor alterations. This allowed the Australian Guidelines to be developed in a shorter time frame and at a lower cost. We recommend the GRADE-ADOLOPMENT approach, especially if a credible set of guidelines that was developed using the GRADE approach is available with all supporting materials. Other countries may consider this approach when developing and/or revising national movement guidelines.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS