Was Justice Joseph story a christian constitutionalist?

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-1-2019

Abstract

Unlike modern originalists, Justice Joseph Story (1779-1845) endorsed the maxim that “Christianity is a part of the common law,” and he seems thus to have considered Christianity deeply entangled with the Constitution. A Harvard graduate and Massachusetts Unitarian, he did not consider the Constitution bound to any specific Christian orthodoxy. Rather, by the Revolution, American Christianity itself had become tolerant of differences in doctrine and worship, while sharing an understanding of moral duty, embodied in the common law. Thus he could at once subscribe to the proposition that Christianity is a part of the common law and decide religion cases so as to uphold the separation of church and state, protecting church property from state interference, and protecting a municipally-run school from clerical influence. On the issue of slavery, his commitments to a living faith and to a settled Constitution collided, calling into question the Christian constitutionalism to which he devoted his professional life.

Publication Source (Journal or Book title)

Great Christian Jurists in American History

First Page

144

Last Page

160

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS