Comparative journal ratings: A survey report
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2009
Abstract
The expert survey and bibliometric methods of assessing the quality of work in political science are complementary. This project builds on previous surveys of academic political science journals conducted among US political scientists. The current wave extends the survey to political scientists in Canada and the UK. Preliminary results suggest both similarities and differences across the three countries. These results matter for policy debate in any country that is considering channelling flows of funds to universities in proportion to the quality of their research, and in helping to supply objective evidence about the research quality of work submitted by candidates for academic appointments and promotions. © 2009 Political Studies Association.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Political Studies Review
First Page
18
Last Page
38
Recommended Citation
McLean, I., Blais, A., Garand, J., & Giles, M. (2009). Comparative journal ratings: A survey report. Political Studies Review, 7 (1), 18-38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1478-9299.2008.00168.x