An alternative view of public subsidy and sport facilities through social anchor theory
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-1-2013
Abstract
This research article sought to review and refine the concept of social anchor theory (SAT) through sport facilities. According to this conception of SAT, organizations and/or institutions can contribute to the development of the overall community through two components: social capital and collective identity. This notion is supported across diverse literatures including architecture, sociology, public administration and urban development. While considerable research on sport facilities is primarily centered on them as physical, financial, political and economic structures, a dearth of research explores the role of the facility as a social anchor and its roles within both formal and informal community development. Our conclusions suggest that sport facilities are, indeed, viable social anchors within communities and community networks. Further, they are capable of maintaining a collective image or creating a preferred image for both community members and a fan nation. Finally, based on this information, municipal investment into sport venues should not be strictly looked at as a vehicle to produce economic returns. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
City, Culture and Society
First Page
49
Last Page
55
Recommended Citation
Seifried, C., & Clopton, A. (2013). An alternative view of public subsidy and sport facilities through social anchor theory. City, Culture and Society, 4 (1), 49-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccs.2013.01.001