Replicating Criterion Validity in Science Content for the Combination of Critical Content Monitoring and Sentence Verification Technique
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
9-1-2019
Abstract
The purpose of the research was to replicate commonality analysis for two measures: critical content monitoring and sentence verification technique. Participants were 967 fourth-, fifth-, and sixth-grade students across seven public primary schools in a southeastern U.S. district. The predictor variables were administered as benchmarks 3 times in an academic year. Predictor scores were compared with science content test and reading comprehension scores from the Stanford Achievement Test–Tenth Edition abbreviated online form and a statewide accountability test. Commonality analysis results indicated that scores from both critical content monitoring and sentence verification technique added unique variance to explanatory models, replicating previous findings. In most cases, critical content monitoring scores provided the greatest percentage of unique and common variance to model explanations.
Publication Source (Journal or Book title)
Assessment for Effective Intervention
First Page
292
Last Page
299
Recommended Citation
Mooney, P., & Lastrapes, R. (2019). Replicating Criterion Validity in Science Content for the Combination of Critical Content Monitoring and Sentence Verification Technique. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 44 (4), 292-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/1534508418758362