Participant characteristics in the prevention of gestational diabetes as evidence for precision medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Authors

Siew Lim, Monash University
Siew Lim, Monash University
Wubet Worku Takele, Monash University
Kimberly K. Vesco, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Leanne M. Redman, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Wesley Hannah, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation
Wesley Hannah, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation
Maxine P. Bonham, Monash University
Mingling Chen, Monash University
Sian C. Chivers, King's College London
Andrea J. Fawcett, Children's Memorial Hospital
Andrea J. Fawcett, Children's Memorial Hospital
Jessica A. Grieger, Adelaide Medical School
Nahal Habibi, Adelaide Medical School
Gloria K.W. Leung, Monash University
Kai Liu, Monash University
Eskedar Getie Mekonnen, Universiteit Antwerpen
Maleesa Pathirana, Adelaide Medical School
Alejandra Quinteros, Adelaide Medical School
Rachael Taylor, University of Newcastle, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing
Gebresilasea G. Ukke, Monash University
Gebresilasea G. Ukke, Monash University
Shao J. Zhou, The University of Adelaide
Paul W. Franks, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Stephen S. Rich, University of Virginia School of Medicine
Robert Wagner, Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum
Tina Vilsbøll, Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen
Miriam S. Udler, Massachusetts General Hospital
Tiinamaija Tuomi, Helsinki University Hospital
Arianne Sweeting, Faculty of Medicine and Health
Emily K. Sims, Indiana University School of Medicine
Jennifer L. Sherr, Yale School of Medicine
Robert K. Semple, Edinburgh Medical School
Rebecca M. Reynolds, Edinburgh Medical School

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2023

Abstract

Background: Precision prevention involves using the unique characteristics of a particular group to determine their responses to preventive interventions. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the participant characteristics associated with responses to interventions in gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) prevention. Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Pubmed to identify lifestyle (diet, physical activity, or both), metformin, myoinositol/inositol and probiotics interventions of GDM prevention published up to May 24, 2022. Results: From 10347 studies, 116 studies (n = 40940 women) are included. Physical activity results in greater GDM reduction in participants with a normal body mass index (BMI) at baseline compared to obese BMI (risk ratio, 95% confidence interval: 0.06 [0.03, 0.14] vs 0.68 [0.26, 1.60]). Combined diet and physical activity interventions result in greater GDM reduction in participants without polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) than those with PCOS (0.62 [0.47, 0.82] vs 1.12 [0.78–1.61]) and in those without a history of GDM than those with unspecified GDM history (0.62 [0.47, 0.81] vs 0.85 [0.76, 0.95]). Metformin interventions are more effective in participants with PCOS than those with unspecified status (0.38 [0.19, 0.74] vs 0.59 [0.25, 1.43]), or when commenced preconception than during pregnancy (0.21 [0.11, 0.40] vs 1.15 [0.86–1.55]). Parity, history of having a large-for-gestational-age infant or family history of diabetes have no effect on intervention responses. Conclusions: GDM prevention through metformin or lifestyle differs according to some individual characteristics. Future research should include trials commencing preconception and provide results disaggregated by a priori defined participant characteristics including social and environmental factors, clinical traits, and other novel risk factors to predict GDM prevention through interventions.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS