Precision treatment of beta-cell monogenic diabetes: a systematic review

Authors

Rochelle N. Naylor, The University of Chicago
Kashyap A. Patel, University of Exeter Medical School
Jarno L.T. Kettunen, Helsinki University Hospital
Jonna M.E. Männistö, Kuopio University Hospital
Julie Støy, Aarhus Universitetshospital
Julie Støy, Aarhus Universitetshospital
Jacques Beltrand, Hôpital Necker Enfants Malades
Michel Polak, Institut Cochin
Paul W. Franks, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health
Stephen S. Rich, University of Virginia School of Medicine
Robert Wagner, Deutsches Diabetes-Zentrum
Tina Vilsbøll, Københavns Universitet
Kimberly K. Vesco, Kaiser Permanente Center for Health Research
Miriam S. Udler, Massachusetts General Hospital
Tiinamaija Tuomi, Helsinki University Hospital
Arianne Sweeting, Faculty of Medicine and Health
Emily K. Sims, Indiana University School of Medicine
Jennifer L. Sherr, Yale School of Medicine
Robert K. Semple, Edinburgh Medical School
Rebecca M. Reynolds, Edinburgh Medical School
Maria J. Redondo, Baylor College of Medicine
Leanne M. Redman, Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Richard E. Pratley, AdventHealth Translational Research Institute
Rodica Pop-Busui, University of Michigan Medical School
Toni I. Pollin, University of Maryland School of Medicine
Wei Perng, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Ewan R. Pearson, University of Dundee School of Medicine
Susan E. Ozanne, University of Cambridge
Katharine R. Owen, University of Oxford Medical Sciences Division
Richard Oram, University of Exeter Medical School
Rinki Murphy, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences
Viswanathan Mohan, Madras Diabetes Research Foundation
Shivani Misra, Imperial College London
James B. Meigs, Harvard Medical School

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

12-1-2024

Abstract

Background: Beta-cell monogenic forms of diabetes have strong support for precision medicine. We systematically analyzed evidence for precision treatments for GCK-related hyperglycemia, HNF1A-, HNF4A- and HNF1B-diabetes, and mitochondrial diabetes (MD) due to m.3243 A > G variant, 6q24-transient neonatal diabetes mellitus (TND) and SLC19A2-diabetes. Methods: The search of PubMed, MEDLINE, and Embase for individual and group level data for glycemic outcomes using inclusion (English, original articles written after 1992) and exclusion (VUS, multiple diabetes types, absent/aggregated treatment effect measures) criteria. The risk of bias was assessed using NHLBI study-quality assessment tools. Data extracted from Covidence were summarized and presented as descriptive statistics in tables and text. Results: There are 146 studies included, with only six being experimental studies. For GCK-related hyperglycemia, the six studies (35 individuals) assessing therapy discontinuation show no HbA1c deterioration. A randomized trial (18 individuals per group) shows that sulfonylureas (SU) were more effective in HNF1A-diabetes than in type 2 diabetes. Cohort and case studies support SU’s effectiveness in lowering HbA1c. Two cross-over trials (each with 15–16 individuals) suggest glinides and GLP-1 receptor agonists might be used in place of SU. Evidence for HNF4A-diabetes is limited. Most reported patients with HNF1B-diabetes (N = 293) and MD (N = 233) are on insulin without treatment studies. Limited data support oral agents after relapse in 6q24-TND and for thiamine improving glycemic control and reducing/eliminating insulin requirement in SLC19A2-diabetes. Conclusion: There is limited evidence, and with moderate or serious risk of bias, to guide monogenic diabetes treatment. Further evidence is needed to examine the optimum treatment in monogenic subtypes.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS